首页> 外文OA文献 >Volumetric upper airway changes after rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Volumetric upper airway changes after rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:上颌快速扩张后上呼吸道容积的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析

摘要

BACKGROUND Although Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) has been used for over a century, its effect on upper airways has not yet adequately been assessed in an evidence-based manner. OBJECTIVE To investigate the volumetric changes in the upper airway spaces following RME in growing subjects by means of acoustic rhinometry, three-dimensional radiography and digital photogrammetry. SEARCH METHODS Literature search of electronic databases and additional manual searches up to February 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized clinical trials, prospective or retrospective controlled clinical trials and cohort clinical studies of at least eight patients, where the RME appliance was left in place for retention, and a maximum follow-up of 8 months post-expansion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS After duplicate data extraction and assessment of the risk of bias, the mean differences and 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) of upper airway volume changes were calculated with random-effects meta-analyses, followed by subgroup analyses, meta-regressions, and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Twenty studies were eligible for qualitative synthesis, of which 17 (3 controlled clinical studies and 14 cohort studies) were used in quantitative analysis. As far as total airway volume is concerned patients treated with RME showed a significant increase post-expansion (5 studies; increase from baseline: 1218.3mm(3); 95 per cent CI: 702.0 to 1734.6mm(3)), which did not seem to considerably diminish after the retention period (11 studies; increase from baseline: 1143.9mm(3); 95 per cent CI: 696.9 to 1590.9mm(3)). LIMITATIONS However, the overall quality of evidence was judged as very low, due to methodological limitations of the included studies, absence of untreated control groups, and inconsistency among studies. CONCLUSIONS RME seems to be associated with an increase in the nasal cavity volume in the short and in the long term. However, additional well-conducted prospective controlled clinical studies are needed to confirm the present findings. REGISTRATION None. FUNDING Australian Society of Orthodontics Foundation for Research and Education Inc.
机译:背景技术尽管快速上颌骨扩张术(RME)已经使用了一个多世纪,但其对上呼吸道的影响尚未以基于证据的方式充分评估。目的通过声学流变仪,三维射线照相法和数字摄影测量法研究成长中的受试者RME后上呼吸道空间的体积变化。搜索方法截至2016年2月,对电子数据库进行文献搜索以及其他手动搜索。选择标准随机临床试验,前瞻性或回顾性对照临床试验以及至少8例患者的队列临床研究,其中保留RME矫治器的位置,以及扩张后最多8个月的随访。数据收集与分析在重复提取数据并评估偏倚风险后,通过随机效应荟萃分析计算上呼吸道容积变化的平均差异和95%置信区间(CIs),然后进行亚组分析,荟萃分析。回归和敏感性分析。结果二十项研究可进行定性合成,其中17项(3项对照临床研究和14项队列研究)用于定量分析。就总气道容量而言,接受RME治疗的患者在扩张后表现出显着增加(5个研究;比基线增加:1218.3mm(3); 95%CI:702.0至1734.6mm(3)),但没有保留期后似乎大大减少(11项研究;从基线增加:1143.9mm(3); 95%CI:696.9至1590.9mm(3))。局限性然而,由于所纳入研究的方法学局限性,缺乏未经治疗的对照组以及研究之间的不一致,因此总体证据质量被认为很低。结论RME在短期和长期内似乎与鼻腔容积增加有关。但是,需要进行其他进行良好的前瞻性对照临床研究以证实目前的发现。注册无。资金澳大利亚正畸学会研究与教育基金会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号